Affirmative Action Discrimination Against Minorities

Othmane Ezzabdi AP Seminar Affirmative Action Affirmative action has been apart of the work environment in America since the 1960s until present time. Its main goal has been to suppress the discrimination against minorities and to give them a fighting chance to succeed in achieving their goal of living the American dream all in an act to counter the inexcusable racism and discrimination that has been inhumanely placed on to the minorities over a century ago in the United States; it will ultimately lead to the end of stereotypes and prejudice (Becker, n.d.). Due to the historical and social aspects connected with affirmative action, this policy should still be part of the workplace in America because it has drastically amplified diversity in companies and permits minorities of all different races to have an equal fighting chance of moving past their poor, horribly lives due to the injustice they faced and into success they have longed yearned for. Affirmative action should still have an active role in the workplace in America bec ause by analyzing the historical past of affirmative action one can conclude that affirmative action has played a major role in increasing the diversity among companies. On March 6, 1961 President John F. Kennedy issued the Executive Order 10925 or also known as the policy of affirmative action. He envisioned for this policy to create equal chances for all races in the work environment and that all employees are treated fairly during service,Show MoreRelatedAffirmative Action And Discrimination Against Women And Minority Groups1386 Words   |  6 PagesA policy designed to redress past discrimination against women and minority groups through measures to improve their economic and educational opportunities. By definition seems to explain affirmative action and to help subsidize for past discrimination. Affirmative action has foremost affects in college admissions and employment. Especially, in employment more qualified women applicants are hired solely in the fact that they are memb ers of a minority group. The Women’s Movement has fought for theRead MoreAffirmative Action : Discrimination Against Women, Minorities, And Those With Disabilities1947 Words   |  8 PagesAffirmative Action I had no need to apologize that the look-wider, search more affirmative action that Princeton and Yale practiced had opened doors for me. That was its purpose: to create conditions whereby students from disadvantaged backgrounds could be brought to the starting line of a race many were unaware was even being run, says Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor. The civil rights act of 1964 set affirmative action in motion. It gave Minority groups the ability to attend schools andRead MoreAffirmative Action Is The Most Important Modern Anti Discrimination1578 Words   |  7 PagesUnited States of America once said that â€Å"affirmative action is the most important modern anti-discrimination technique ever instituted in the United States. It is the one tool that has had a demonstrable effect on discrimination. No one who knows anything about the subject would say it hasn t worked. It has certainly done something, or else it wouldn t have provoked so much opposition†. This means that affirmative action is a modern anti-discrimination technique that has been more effectiveRead MoreThe Equal Employment Opportunity Act1119 Words   |  5 Pagesand gender minorities on the same level of white males in employment (â€Å"Equal Employment†). This was because of the dominance that white males held in the workplace and the struggle for minorities to get and keep a job, sometimes due to discrimination. Through this act, Affirmative Action was established to ensure that a certain amount of minorities were able to get a quality education and to get jobs in places that they would have struggled to be employed at before. Affirmative Action has helpedRead MoreAffirmative Action : An Effective Organization1430 Words   |  6 PagesEssay Professor Jeffery Cahan 05/10/2016 Affirmative Action According to Merriam Webster, by definition â€Å"Affirmative Action is an active effort to improve the employment or educational opportunities of members of minority groups and women. Also similar effort to promote the rights or progress of other disadvantaged persons† Affirmative action has been a hot topic among some American citizens and government officials. â€Å"Affirmative action is the process of a business or governmentalRead MoreAffirmative Action Wrong or Right1100 Words   |  5 PagesAffirmative Action Wrong or Right Affirmative action is wrong and will not help solve the problems minorities face. The reason it is wrong is because its discrimination. It has no place in todays society in todays society because it does more bad than good. In addition to that most people dont enjoy the presence of affirmative action. Also, it appears that affirmative action can actually be detrimental to employees health. First of all, affirmative action is discrimination; thereRead MoreAffirmative Action : An Unfair Advantage For Minorities1198 Words   |  5 PagesAffirmation Action Produces Negative Reactions In the early 1960’s, President Kennedy issued an executive order to ensure that government contractors hire and treat employees without regard to race, creed, color, or national origin. This executive order was issued so that all would have equal opportunities when qualified especially in regard to higher education and employment. However, it wasn’t until President Johnson issued his executive order in 1965 that it was developed and enforced. AffirmativeRead MoreAffirmative Action vs Reverse Discrimination Essay1614 Words   |  7 PagesAffirmative Action or Reverse Discrimination Colleen Koehn Business Law 1038 Instructor Jackie Sexson March 1, 2010 South University Online There has been a large debate in recent years if affirmative action has gone against the American way, has affirmative action caused reverse discrimination? The establishment of affirmative action was put into place to create equal rights for racial minorities, ethnic minorities, women, the physically disabled and those who served in the militaryRead MoreAffirmative Action: Social Policy1348 Words   |  6 PagesAffirmative Action Affirmative action is a social policy created to promote the welfare of minorities by supporting the idea that individuals are all created equal and should not be judged by race or gender. Therefore, in situations like job and university applications, we should consider minorities to be as feasible a choice for hire as a white male candidate, taking into consideration their background. In short, it tries to give minorities that have been at a disadvantage their whole life, anRead MoreEssay on Affirmative Action924 Words   |  4 PagesIntroduction Affirmative Action began in 1965 when President Johnson signed the Executive Order 11246 in to law. The Executive Order prevents federal contractors from discriminating against any employee or applicant for employment because of race, color, religion, sex, or national origin. The phrase â€Å"affirmative action† was first coined, when federal contractors were required to take affirmative action to ensure that applicants were not discriminated against in anyway. When affirmative action was created

1984 Oppression Of Truth Essay - 1577 Words

In the novel 1984, Orwell produced a social critique on totalitarianism and a future dystopia that made the world pause and think about our past, present and future. When reading this novel we all must take the time to think of the possibility that Orwells world could come to pass. Orwell presents the concepts of power, marginalization, and resistance through physical, psychological, sexual and political control of the people of Oceania. The reader experiences the emotional ride through the eyes of Winston Smith, who was born into the oppressive life under the rule of Ingsoc. Readers are encouraged through Winston to adopt a negative opinion on the idea of communist rule and the inherent dangers of totalitarianism. The psychological†¦show more content†¦The main version of this surveillance is through the telescreen that is stationed in every room constantly watching the people. There is always propaganda across the screen supporting Big Brother and the endeavors of Ingsoc. The telescreen combined with the thought police is the ultimate tool for destroying individual thought, The smallest thing could give you away. A nervous tic, an unconscious look of anxiety, a habit of muttering to yourself-anything that carried with it the suggestion of abnormality, of having something to hide (Orwell). This non-stop flow of information stimulates everyone to join in with the demands of Big Brother even when they do not want to. Even the telescreens and Thought Police are not enough because the people are faced with the omnipresent signs reading BIG BROTHER IS WATCHING YOU, that are constantly scrutinizing them. Naturally inherent with paradoxes such as War is Peace, Freedom is Slavery and Ignorance is Strength, this mode of communication encompasses one goal: to erase all ability for original, creative, and therefore possible heretical thought. This step that the party has taken to oppress the people through the devastation of language as the people knows it. The development of Newspeak, although seeming to improve the civilization, depletes thought, creativity, and individualism in its speakers. The language of Oceania is thoroughly phony;Show MoreRelatedThe Novel, 1984, By George Orwell923 Words   |  4 Pagesdystopian novels, wrote his most famous book, 1984, in the 1940s. Almost 60 years later in 1999 the Wachowski brothers wrote and directed one of the greatest film trilogies of all time, The Matrix. Both the novel and the movies depicted post apocalyptic dystopian worlds under some form of an oppressive government. Oppression, control, and sexuality are some of the prominent themes throughout the storylines. While some may argue that the novel 1984 did not inspire the Wachowski brothers, many clearRead MoreMarxism: 1984 by George Orwell1405 Words   |  6 PagesMarxism In the Novel 1984 Throughout time, rulers and controlling governments have used the ideas of Marxism to take and maintain control over the working class. Even today ideas such as classism and commodification are used in countries such as North Korea and Syria to help governments rule over their citizens. In George Orwell’s 1984 the ideas of Marxism are used to oppress proletariats. The Party tricks the citizens of Oceania into thinking that their propaganda benefits the working class,Read MoreOppression in Dystopian Societies1154 Words   |  5 Pagessocieties shown in George Orwell’s 1984 and Kurt WImmer’s Equilibrium present the readers with a state of society where everything is totalitarian and environmentally corrupt. Through the Government’s methods of control, the citizens lose their individuality and freedom. Acts of fear and oppression though technological advancements in both 1984 and Equilibrium evoke Oceaninans to trust the higher forms of authority to protec t them, and make them feel safe. 1984 and Equilibrium portray a futuristicRead MoreHumanity In George Orwells 19841083 Words   |  5 PagesHumanity in 1984 George Orwell’s 1984 is more than just a novel, it is a warning to a potential dystopian society of the future. Written in 1949, Orwell envisioned a totalitarian government under the figurehead Big Brother. In this totalitarian society, every thought and action is carefully examined for any sign of rebellion against the ruling party. Emotion has been abolished and love is nonexistent; an entire new language is being drafted to reduce human thought to the bare minimum. In a societyRead MoreComparison Of Shooting An Elephant By George Orwell827 Words   |  4 PagesOrwell’s first literary works were his essays regarding his experiences as a policeman in Burma during imperialization from Europe. These essays include â€Å"A Hanging† and â€Å"Shooting an Elephant.† In these essays, he shows his clear disagreement of oppression, even while working for the oppressors. Orwell writes â€Å"I was all for the Burmese and all against their oppressors . . . . As fo r the job I was doing, I hated it more bitterly than I can perhaps make clear;† although he despised the Burmese, he recognizedRead MoreGeorge Orwell s 1984 1459 Words   |  6 PagesAt the point when George Orwell penned his new-popular tragic novel, 1984 discharged 67 years prior in June 1949, it was expected as fiction. The innovative setting is over three decades in our back window reflect, yet numerous parts of the book have come shockingly genuine today. The novel tells a socially stratified post atomic war world led by three superstrates. Luckily, there s been no worldwide atomic war, generally in light of the fact that president elect Donald Trump hasn t assumed controlRead MoreAnalysis Of The Book 1984 1452 Words   |  6 Pagesnovel, 1984, was written. This book talks about the horrors of torture our main character was forced into. This comes as a hard pill to swallow knowing that the author of the book more than likely got his inspiration from the totalitarian g overnments in existence during his time of life. More real than anything else in life is fear through torture, the real life thought of being tortured sends shock waves of fear into people, one of the worst of consequences these people live in is oppression and outwardlyRead MoreCompare and Contrast Essay: Brave New World Versus 19841675 Words   |  7 Pagespeople in order to become powerful. In the novels, Brave New World by Aldous Huxley and 1984 by George Orwell, two futuristic dystopias are depicted. Both of them show totalitarian rule, where liberty has been deprived by different means of control. In Brave New World, the control of society is maintained through a peaceful way that consists in convincing people of loving their lack freedom. On the other side, in 1984, control is upheld by surveillance, the restriction of information, and torture. TheRead MoreGovernment Control Of 1984 And Brave New World1653 Words   |  7 PagesGovernment Control in 1984 and Brave New World In light of current events, society is more concerned than ever about just how much power the government has over people. Individuals are concerned that those in charge might implement policies that could deteriorate certain groups’ quality of living. To some, this may be foolish, but as is shown in some novels, this could happen, and when it does, it is hard to combat. In both George Orwell’s 1984 and Aldous Huxley’s Brave New World authors depictRead MoreGeorge Orwell s Fahrenheit 451 1092 Words   |  5 Pagescondemning them to intellectual poverty. This concept of intellectual repression will be explored through two classic dystopian texts; 1984 and Fahrenheit 451. Orwell’s 1984 was committed to paper under the backdrop of the Stalinist totalitarian regime in the Soviet Union, where the freedom of thought had been abolished; which parallels the fascist sovereignty of 1984, governed under the omnipresent puppeteer, Big Brother. Intended to be a warning to humanity concerning the â€Å"poisons of totalitarianism†

Vicarious Liability Essay Sample free essay sample

Vicarious liability arises when one party is responsible for the civil wrong of another. This state of affairs occurs often when an employer is held responsible for the civil wrongs committed by an employee. An employer can merely be held responsible for the civil wrongs of an employee. non for an independent contractor. There are besides some regulations that must be satisfied. First it must be proven that the tortfeaser is an employee. The act the tortfeaser ( employee ) carried out must be Byzantine or condemnable. The Byzantine or condemnable act must hold been during the class of employment. There are 3 trials to set up whether an person is an employee or an independent contractor these are the control trial. integrating trial and the economic world trial. which is besides known as the multiple trial. The control trial analyses who has control over the manner that the work is carried out. If the employer sets out how the work is to be done and when it is to be done by so the tri bunals are more likely to see the individual transporting out the work as an employee. However. if it is up to the individual transporting out the work how to find how and when it should be done. so that individual is more likely to be considered an independent contractor by the tribunals and is therefore responsible for their ain civil wrongs. This trial was applied in Mersey docks v Coggins Ltd ( 1947 ) The integrating trial looks at whether the person’s work is an built-in portion of the concern. If they are an built-in portion of a concern for illustration a boulder clay worker. so they are more likely to be seen as an employee to the tribunals. If they are non seen as an built-in portion of the concern for illustration some one who has come in to repair a boulder clay. so they will be seen by the tribunals as a independent contractor. This trial was established in Stevenson V McDonald ( 1969 ) . The economic world trial looks at the contractual relationship between the supporting two parties. An person who has a contract of service is more likely to be seen as an employee by the tribunals. Whereas. an person who has a contract for services. is more likely to be seen as an independent contractor. The tribunals may besides look at the manner an person is paid. If an person is paid a wage and the individual they are working for makes revenue enhancement decreases. so the person is more likely to be seen as an employee. If nevertheless. the individual is paid a ball amount and has to do their ain decrease they are more likely to be seen as an independent contractor. There are besides elements to see which are inconsistent with a contract of employment. which includes ; the ability to engage ain employees. demand that you provide your ain tools and stuffs and that you pay your ain revenue enhancement and national insurance. This trial was applied in the Ready Mixed Concrete Ltd 5 Minister of Pensions and National Insurance ( 1968 ) where it was held that the driver was an independent contractor. The Salmond trial establishes whether the Byzantine act was during the class of employment. Fortunes where civil wrongs fall within the class of employment include: unlawful act authorised by the employer as in Poland V Parr ( 1927 ) in this instance an employee assaulted a male child who was stealing from his employer’s lorry. Unlawful and unauthorized manner of making Acts of the Apostless authorised by the employer is another illustration. Another clip when vicarious liability applies is when an employee carries out an expressly out act but one that is of benefit to the employer such as in the instance of Rose v Plenty ( 1976 ) . when the unlawful act occurred during going to or from a occupation but the employee is being paid for this clip. There are besides state of affairss when the act doesn’t autumn within the class of employment. For illustration. when an act occurs while the employee is ‘on a play of his or her own’ like in the instance of Hilton v Thomas in this instance employees took an unauthorized interruption and on returning one o f the employees crashed the new wave killing person. the employer wasn’t held apt for this. Employers can besides be held apt for condemnable Acts of the Apostless that besides amount to civil wrongs. For illustration in Lister V Hesley ( 2001 ) in this instance. employers were held responsible for an employee who had sexually abused 3 claimants. Vicarious liability is a combative country of the jurisprudence. as it is the construct of enforcing duty and liability on a 3rd party. There are nevertheless many justifications for enforcing vicarious liability on a 3rd party for illustration employers. One ground is that the employer benefits from the work of the employee. and should hence be held responsible for any wrongs they commit. In add-on. because employers are held responsible for any actions their employees make they should besides be held accountable for the civil wrongs of their employees and guarantee they carry out the work safely. This will so drive up quality criterions for other employers in that same pattern. This may assist forestall other civil wrongs of a similar nature from happening. therefore protecting the populace and other employees from Byzantine Acts of the Apostless. Another justification for enforcing liability on a 3rd party is that they are more able to bear the fiscal load of liability. This justification besides ensures that the claimant is compensated adequately for their harm. which is an purpose of civil wrong jurisprudence. Employers besides have to hold or pay mandatory insurance. When Byzantine Acts of the Apostless occur the employer would merely pay the insurance premiums non the compensation itself. The chance of increased premiums may drive other employers from a similar profession to increase their criterions of wellness and safety therefore moving as disincentive to others which is another purpose of civil wrong jurisprudence. Employers besides have the power to train employees for hapless on the job pattern. they hence have the ability to understate the hazard of Byzantine Acts of the Apostless. If they don’t train their employees and so they commit a Byzantine act for a similar ground so employers should be found apt as they did non make everything they could to forestall this civil wrong from happening. Conversely. there are facets of vicariou s liability that seem really unjust on employers. Vicarious liability can be seen every bit unjust as it contradicts the basic ‘fault’ rule of civil wrong jurisprudence. In footings of the employer/employee state of affairs. it is doing the employer a tortfeaser every bit good as the employee when it was the employees own mistake. This can be seen every bit unjust as they are keeping the employer responsible for actions of an independent. self-thinking single. whom is able to anticipate effects to the actions they make. Another facet that can be seen unjust is that even if the employer expressly forbids an employee from carry oning a certain activity and the employee still does it. the employer can still be found apt. This occurred in the instance of Limpus v London General Omnibus Company ( 1862 ) . In this instance the employer expressly forbade the coach drivers from rushing. yet they did it anyhow and injured the claimant. and the employer was found vicariously apt. This is clearly a strong statement against the equity of vicarious liability as the employer had taken action against behavior that could do hurt and yet he was still held apt for the effects of his employees’ actions. Another statement against vicarious liability is that regulations and/or trials for vicarious liability are applied inconsistently. this produces the result of instances that contradict each other. There are two illustrations of this. The first eample of contradictory instances is between Rose v Plenty and Twine V Beans Express. In Rose the employer was held apt for the actions of their employee. which resulted in a male child. being injured after the employee gave him unauthorized lifts. However. in Twine the employer was non found apt for the hurt caused by the employee. The merely little difference in the instances is that the employer was non profiting from the claimant deriving a lift in Twine. This determination makes it look unjust for the employers in Rose to hold been apt. Particularly since they were non likely to hold been cognizant of these lifts happening. The 2nd illustration is between Limpus v London General Omnibus Company ( 1862 ) and Beard v London General Omnibus Company ( 1900 ) . In Limpus employers were found apt whereas in Beard the employers were non found vicariously apt. It can besides be perceived as extremely unjust for an employer to be held vicarious apt if the mere careless actions of an employee. which lead to a claim. was the first clip this kind of behavior had occurred. This occurred in Century Insurance Co. Ltd v Northern Ireland Transport Board ( 1942 ) when the employee heedlessly through down a lit lucifer in a gasoline station doing an detonation. Due to this being the first illustration of careless behaviour the employer had no chance to train the employee which could hold stopped this Byzantine act from happening. Furthermore in this peculiar instance no sensible employer would hold moderately anticipate a sensible employee from throwing down a lit lucifer. After all it is common sense that this could ensue in an detonation. It can be argued that in this instance the employer was held vicariously apt for the employees’ mere sloppiness. and this can be perceived as unfair on all employers if they are held for mere sloppiness of an employee which they couldn’t have foreseen. In Trotman v North Yorkshire County Council ( 1999 ) the employer was non held vicariously apt for the Byzantine actions of their employee ( who committed the offense of sexual torment on one male pupil ) . The tribunals general feeling was that the more utmost the act of the employee. the less likely. and the less just it would be for the employer to be held vicariously apt for the Byzantine actions. However in the instance of Lister v Hesley Hall Ltd ( 2001 ) the employer was held vicariously apt. This was a consequence of a new cardinal trial being introduced. The new trial was to place if there was sufficient connexion between the employment and the civil wrongs carried out by the employee. This trial now means that if the civil wrong was beyond the class of employment. the employer could still be held apt every bit long as there is a nexus between the civil wrong and the employment. This makes it progressively unjust on employers as there are non any safeguards they can take that will protect them from being held vicariously apt if the civil wrong has a nexus with the employment. For illustration they could hold given employees extended preparation and policies on what is acceptable and unacceptable behavior and they will still be apt. Since the Lister instance. the trial that was established in it has been used in Mattis V Pollock ( 2003 ) where the chucker-out went place after a battle at the nine. came back and stabbed the claimant. The employers were held apt were held apt. Before the Lister instance the employers wouldn’t have been apt because this unauthorized act didn’t profit them in anyway and was beyond the class of employment. However the tribunals decided that there was a close connexion between the employment and the civil wrong as chucker-outs are supposed to be intimidating. Overall. although there are many justifications for vicarious liability. it would look that it is extremely unjust on employers as there is no existent manner of them protecting themselves from being held vicariously apt since the instance of Lister v Hesley Hall Ltd ( 2001 ) . The lone thing that may go on is that the insurance companies may action the employee for insurance. This occurred in Lister V Romford Ice and Cold Storage Ltd ( 1957 ) . However this option is seldom used due to the strong unfavorable judgments it receives as it destroys the intent of vicarious liability.

Autism

Autism-theory of mind Essay AUTISM Autism is a rare developmental disorder that affects approximately four in every ten thousand children (Baron-Cohen, Leslie Frith, 1985). Employing a clinical perspective, Kanner (1943) (as cited in Sachs, 1995) was the first to provide a description on the disorder of autism. However, in the 1970s, Wing (1970) (as cited in Sachs, 1995) applied a cognitive perspective in describing the mental structure of autism. This essay will therefore argue that autism is characterised by the lack of theory of mind (Premack Woodruff, 1978, as cited in Baron-Cohen et al., 1985), which is a cognitive mechanism. It will further outline empirical evidence derived from the review of two studies, collectively known as false belief tasks. The Sally-Anne task and the Smarties task, in particular, will be discussed and interpreted in support with the arguing thesis. There is no true causal definition of autism at a biological level, however, autism has been recognised to be a developmental disability affecting cognitive processing (Frith, 1997). The key behavioural deficits that characterises autism are, the inability to interact in social situations, impairments with comprehending verbal and non-verbal communication and the lack of understanding pretend and imaginative play (Wing, 1970, as cited in Sachs, 1995). Other behavioural characteristics contributing to the diagnosis of autism are, engagement in repetitive automatic movements and activities, preference to be alone, displays of self-destruction and aggressive behaviour, sensitivity to external stimuli, attacks of anxiety, and some display savant abilities (Sachs, 1995; Frith, 1997). Baron-Cohen et al. (1985) applied Wimmer and Perners (1983) puppet play paradigm to test the hypothesis that autistic children are unable to attribute beliefs to others and are incapable of representing mental states. The participants comprised of 20 autistic children, 14 children with Down syndrome, and 27 normal preschool children. The procedure for this false belief task included setting up two doll protagonists, Sally and Anne. Initially, a naming question was asked to ensure participants could distinguish between the dolls. Sally then placed a marble in her basket. Sally exited the scene, and Anne takes the marble from Sallys basket and placed it in her box. Sally later returned, and the test question asked by the experimenter was Where will Sally look for her marble? (Baron-Cohen et al., 1985, p.41). The subjects also had to answer two control questions: a reality control question and a memory control question. Another trial was preformed, where conditions were changed, and included an additional location (experimenters pocket) to where the participants could point. The outcome for this study indicated that all subjects passed the naming, reality and memory questions. For the belief question, 85% of normal preschool and 86% of Down syndrome subjects passed both trials. However, only 20% of the autistic group passed the tested question (Baron-Cohen et al. 1985). Interpretation of these results indicates the vast majority of normal preschool and Down syndrome children could contrast between what they see to be true and what the doll sees to be false. However, the 15% of preschool and 14% of Down syndrome children who failed the belief question need to be taken into account. It may be concluded that at the time of testing, the proportion of preschool children had not yet developed the complete theory of mind, which is a mechanism required to succeed in this study. Also, it can be assumed that the proportion of Down syndrome subjects who failed, simply did not fully understand the question being asked as they have a below average IQ range. Other possible reasons for the two control groups to fail on the belief question may be that they comprehended the question as ambiguous. For example, when asked the belief question, the proportion of the control groups who failed, could have registered the question as, If Sally looks in her basket and the marble is not there, where will she look?. In this case the correct answer would be the box. Instead, if the experimenter asked, Where will Sally look first, for her marble?, then that proportion of the control group may have passed. Another inconsistency is that 20% of autistic subjects passed the test. .ua70e0feeb6813d3fc73aeff432a3a22d , .ua70e0feeb6813d3fc73aeff432a3a22d .postImageUrl , .ua70e0feeb6813d3fc73aeff432a3a22d .centered-text-area { min-height: 80px; position: relative; } .ua70e0feeb6813d3fc73aeff432a3a22d , .ua70e0feeb6813d3fc73aeff432a3a22d:hover , .ua70e0feeb6813d3fc73aeff432a3a22d:visited , .ua70e0feeb6813d3fc73aeff432a3a22d:active { border:0!important; } .ua70e0feeb6813d3fc73aeff432a3a22d .clearfix:after { content: ""; display: table; clear: both; } .ua70e0feeb6813d3fc73aeff432a3a22d { display: block; transition: background-color 250ms; webkit-transition: background-color 250ms; width: 100%; opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #95A5A6; } .ua70e0feeb6813d3fc73aeff432a3a22d:active , .ua70e0feeb6813d3fc73aeff432a3a22d:hover { opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #2C3E50; } .ua70e0feeb6813d3fc73aeff432a3a22d .centered-text-area { width: 100%; position: relative ; } .ua70e0feeb6813d3fc73aeff432a3a22d .ctaText { border-bottom: 0 solid #fff; color: #2980B9; font-size: 16px; font-weight: bold; margin: 0; padding: 0; text-decoration: underline; } .ua70e0feeb6813d3fc73aeff432a3a22d .postTitle { color: #FFFFFF; font-size: 16px; font-weight: 600; margin: 0; padding: 0; width: 100%; } .ua70e0feeb6813d3fc73aeff432a3a22d .ctaButton { background-color: #7F8C8D!important; color: #2980B9; border: none; border-radius: 3px; box-shadow: none; font-size: 14px; font-weight: bold; line-height: 26px; moz-border-radius: 3px; text-align: center; text-decoration: none; text-shadow: none; width: 80px; min-height: 80px; background: url(https://artscolumbia.org/wp-content/plugins/intelly-related-posts/assets/images/simple-arrow.png)no-repeat; position: absolute; right: 0; top: 0; } .ua70e0feeb6813d3fc73aeff432a3a22d:hover .ctaButton { background-color: #34495E!important; } .ua70e0feeb6813d3fc73aeff432a3a22d .centered-text { display: table; height: 80px; padding-left : 18px; top: 0; } .ua70e0feeb6813d3fc73aeff432a3a22d .ua70e0feeb6813d3fc73aeff432a3a22d-content { display: table-cell; margin: 0; padding: 0; padding-right: 108px; position: relative; vertical-align: middle; width: 100%; } .ua70e0feeb6813d3fc73aeff432a3a22d:after { content: ""; display: block; clear: both; } READ: The Member of the Wedding Essay This may be that they were incorrectly diagnosed with the disorder, or they have experienced .